Examining a Few Texas Electricity Ratings Customer Reviews

I get tons of customer reviews through Texas Electricity Ratings, and one of the most consistent issues I see are negative reviews based on misconceptions, or in some cases, a lack of understanding of how the deregulated electricity market works. Since a big part of what I do is to try and help educate people on how the market works I’m going to paste some reviews that I didn’t let through the website for various reasons, which I will explain at length below.

These first two reviews go together:

Continue reading “Examining a Few Texas Electricity Ratings Customer Reviews” »

Some Facts about Pennywise Power & Reliant Energy: Part 1

Last month I published an article which attempted to illustrate the deregulated Texas electricity market. The point was to connect many of the REPs with their parent companies to give consumers a clearer picture of who all the players were in the Texas market.

Building off of that post, I’d like to take a closer look at Pennywise Power. My main reason for this is similar to my post last month, which is to give customers a greater understanding of some of the ownership affiliations for these REPs. With so many REPs being purchased by other companies, I think it’s important that customers who have negative experiences with one company don’t inadvertently sign up with service from another REP who might have the same parent company. By the same token, a customer who might find a better rate from a partner company where they’ve had a positive experience might feel more comfortable switching.

Which brings us to the focus of this article, Pennywise Power. Why am I singling out them out, as opposed to other companies that have multiple REP’s operating in the market? Well, I do think there’s a difference.

Why is Pennywise Power Different?

First, lets take a quick look at their website. It’s a very straightforward and functional website. It’s not cluttered or confusing, and there are really only a few pages to view, a homepage, a page to view available plans, a customer support page with some phone numbers, and an About Us page. The About Us Page doesn’t give much information about the company, it just reinforces their message on the homepage, which is that Pennywise’s purpose is to be a low cost provider with the mission of getting customers the lowest prices. Their no frills website supports this message. Nowhere is there any mention of Pennywise having any kind of corporate affiliation, which is typical if an REP has a parent company, like what you see on Reliant Energy’s website, among others.

But again, I reiterate, what makes Pennywise Power different? Well, for starters, their parent company IS Reliant Energy, who is in turn owned by NRG. I find it strange than an REP with such large parent companies would make no mention of their corporate affiliations anywhere on their website, particularly since the ownership chain includes one of the largest retail electricity providers and one of the largest energy generation companies operating in the United States. With that lineage, why would Pennywise Power’s website make no mention of their ownership and instead present themselves as just a small operation trying to appeal to cost-conscious shoppers?

Considering that Reliant is one of the two incumbent electricity providers operating in Texas and by that token one of the two largest REPs operating in Texas, I figure this garners a bit more attention. Particularly since they’ve been a lightning rod for controversy recently and they’re one of the worst reviewed providers on my website.

Breaking Down the Reliant/Pennywise Connection

Big companies operating multiple REPs isn’t a new thing. Fulcum Power previously owned Amigo and Tara Energy. They purchased Tara after buying Amigo because Tara is a niche REP that marketed to a specific demographic, much like Amigo itself. Under those circumstances, it makes perfect sense to keep operating the Tara brand, since it has specific market recognition. That’s probably half the reason Fulcrum purchased them in the first place. Ditto the recent purchase of StarTex Power by Constellation Energy. Or when Florida Power & Light purchased Gexa years back. Same principle.

The chief difference I see with Pennywise Power is that they weren’t an entity with a brand that was purchased by Reliant. They were created entirely out of thin air by Reliant Energy. They weren’t a company with brand recognition or an existing book of customers that was acquired at a good price. They were started from scratch by Reliant Energy employees in 2008. Their PUC license was initially granted to a company called Reliant Energy Services Texas, LLC. This is separate from the original PUC license that was granted for Reliant Energy, which was filed in 2001 under the company name of Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC. Pretty similar names right? In 2010, the company formally filed to change the name of the the company tied to their PUC Certificate from Reliant Energy Services Texas, LLC to Pennywise Power, LLC. I guess they thought maybe they didn’t want to have their new and fresh brand attached to a parent company named Reliant. Here are links to the respective PUC Licenses, which include a record of their changes over the years: Pennywise Power; Original Reliant Energy.

Also, for the record, if Reliant was looking to separate Pennywise from their parent brand, they might have also considered modifying the information under both Mailing Addresses so all of the company officers weren’t the same people with the same positions and same contact information.

So Why Bother?

So the question is, why would Reliant Energy do this? Particularly since as one of the incumbent providers in Texas, Reliant Energy is already positioned with every possible advantage in the marketplace. They have brand recognition. People who don’t understand the nuances of the system naturally “trust” them because they’re the name they know. They’re bigger than the other guys, they have more money than the other guys, and they’re seen as a stable company that can be trusted. So what is the benefit of creating a new REP with a separate license out of thin air? I obviously can’t answer that definitively, as I have never worked at Reliant and wasn’t involved in whatever meetings took place that led to the creation of Pennywise Power. All I can do is speculate.

In the second half of my article, which I’ll post this afternoon, I’ll take a look at some of the reasons why I think Reliant might be benefiting from Pennywise Power.


Texas Electricity Provider Map

Last week’s purchase of First Choice Power by Direct Energy was yet another major acquisition of a Retail Electricity Provider by a major energy conglomerate. There’s been around a half a dozen of these deals in the past year, and in my opinion things have gotten a bit muddled and confusing. So I wanted to write a post to chart exactly who owns who in the deregulated electricity space in Texas.

Dominion Resources: Dominion Energy probably isn’t a name that is very recognized by Texas electricity customers. However, they are a huge energy company that deals in both energy generation and distribution in multiple states. Headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, they own the incumbent and regulated electricity providers in Virginia and North Carolina. In Texas, they own Cirro Energy, which they purchased in 2008. Earlier this year, Cirro Energy purchased Simple Power and absorbed their customers.

NRG: NRG, a new Jersey based company, is another huge energy company with massive power generation resources. On top of energy generation plants, NRG also owns Green Mountain Energy, which they purchased in 2010 for 350 million dollars. In 2009, they purchased former incumbent Texas electricity provider Reliant Energy for 287 million and change when Reliant was under heavy financial distress. This was a steal considering Reliant was the second largest REP in the state at the time and has huge brand recognition. In turn, Reliant Energy owns (and I believe operates) Pennywise Power, which is a new brand they’ve put into the deregulated Texas electricity market to try and capture different customers without effecting their core brand. So NRG owns Green Mountain and Reliant, and Reliant in turn owns Pennywise Power.

Just Energy – Just Energy is yet another big energy company, with resources all over North America. They had been a fairly smaller player in the retail electricity market in Texas until recently. Just Energy itself was mostly a niche provider, offering 5 year long term contracts to customers. However, they recently purchased the entire retail arm of Fulcrum Power. That includes Amigo Energy, Tara Energy, and Smart Prepaid. So now all of those brands are part of the Just Energy portfolio. They’ll likely keep the branding and still do business under the names Tara and Amigo, but it’s all Just Energy. Just Energy also owns another smaller REP, Commerce Energy.

Direct Energy: Direct Energy is actually a subsidiary of a British company called Centrica, but they’re known almost exclusively in North America as Direct Energy, so that’s the name we’re going with. Direct Energy is yet another huge energy generation company with huge and varied resources. In the retail electricity space they do business as Direct Energy and they are one of the biggest REP’s in Texas. They also operate in Texas as WTU Energy and CPL Energy in two respective TDSPs. In the Spring, Direct Energy also purchased Gateway Energy Resources for 90 millions dollars. Since then, Direct has removed Gateway as a brand from doing business in Texas. Just last week, Direct Energy made another huge purchase, this time of First Choice Power for 270 million dollars. Which is a huge price tag. So, as of now, every company I mentioned above is really a subsidiary of Direct Energy.

Constellation Energy: Constellation Energy is the largest energy supplier in America. Their 2007 revenues were 21 billion dollars. So yes, they’re another big energy guy. They own the regulated electricity entity Baltimore Gas and Electric. In 2 month period last spring and summer, Constellation announced purchases of both StarTex Power as well as MX Energy, two retail electricity providers that operate in the Texas deregulated markets.

Gexa Energy: NextEra Energy is the parent company of Florida Power and Light, the regulated electricity provider for much of Florida. They’re another big energy company, having generation resources in over 20 states. In 2005, Florida Power & Light purchased Gexa Energy. They still do business in Texas under the name Gexa.

Dynowatt: Dynowatt is a subsidiary of Accent Energy, which is a large company with natural gas ties in Ohio. Accent also serves deregulated New York, but they do business in Texas as Dynowatt.

TXU Energy: TXU is actually a subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings, which also owns Luminant, the power generation portion of the old TXU company that was forced to split because of deregulation laws. Now Luminant and TXU operate separately. TXU is the largest individual REP in Texas and one of the two former incumbent providers.

The following Retail Electricity Providers are stand-alone entities:

Texpo Energy: Texpo Energy is a smaller company operating in Texas. What makes them interesting is that they actually operate under 3 different brand names while all sharing the same PUC Certificate. The other two brands are Southwest Power & Light and YEP. So to sum things up, Texpo, Southwest Power & Light, and YEP are all the same company operating in Texas under different names.

  • Champion Energy
  • Stream Energy
  • Ambit Energy
  • Brilliant Energy
  • Texas Power
  • Liberty Power
  • Mega Energy
  • APNA Energy
  • Bounce Energy
  • Spark Energy
  • Hopefully this helps to give people a clearer picture about who some of the players are in Texas electricity. It is important that people know exactly who the company is that is supplying their electricity. For example, if someone had a bad experience with one company, they might not want to get service from another one of their subsidiaries. And since there’s been so many purchases and mergings of REP’s in the last 6 months, I thought it might be a good idea to chronicle which companies have ended where after the dust has settled. I’ll try to update this page moving forward as well. I doubt we’ve seen the last of big REP acquisitions, so this family tree might change.

    I’ve included a crude flowchart below. Yes, I do realize it looks like it was put together by a 3rd grader.

    Texas Electricity Crisis: Explaining the Market Dangers

    Everyone has seen the ERCOT notices to conserve electricity recently. They seem like there have been daily alerts and calls to action for people to regulate their electricity intake for the sake of conservation. I’m sure a lot of people dismiss this stuff out of hand, but the concern is valid. And I’m going to take the time here to explain what is going on behind the scenes that make this a crisis, because I believe there is an extremely high probability that this record drought and heat wave is going to end up driving a number of Retail Electricity Providers (REPs) out of business and change the deregulated electricity market forever.

    The Basics

    Ok, I think the first step in understanding the dangers facing our Texas electricity market is to understand the grid and electricity demand, and how it effects an REP’s expenses. So, starting there, lets state that the Texas Electricity Grid has a capacity to generate 73,000 megawats, or Megs. But the actually every day capacity is more around 68-69k megs because ERCOT wants to be able to maintain their reserves. And lets also keep in mind that almost every day last week, ERCOT was calling for electricity conservation. 3 times last week, the Texas grid had demand higher than 68k megs…so basically, the entire grid red-lined for 3 straight days. That’s an important fact, so keep that in mind, while we take a look at the trading aspects.

    The REPs who bill you every month have to buy electricity, just like we have to buy our electricity. Every month, an REP has to estimate how much electricity they’re going to need to purchase to cover their customer base. So your average REP does some math, estimates what their monthly need will be, and places their order for Megs. They’ll lock in a certain amount at a pre-set price from a trader, and then they’ll go about their business. If they guess close, they’re doing good. If they were too conservative and bought more than they needed, they left some money on the table. If they guess short, then they have to buy spot amounts of electricity from traders at a much higher premium to cover their needs.

    Two important factors to consider: 1.) A key part of an REP estimating their monthly purchase of Megs is taking into account how weather will potentially effect usage. Hotter weather means they need more electricity for their customers to meet their demands. 2.) Last week there were several articles talking about how the demand for electricity was so high during this heat wave that prices were shooting up to 3k dollars per unit during certain hours of the day as to what is normally anywhere from 20-400. Of course, it’s normally anywhere from 20-400 during summers that don’t have record heat and aren’t going through the greatest drought and lack of rain in most of our lifetimes.

    And make no mistake. There’s been almost no rain in Texas in many months and there doesn’t appear to be any end to the record breaking heat in sight.

    The Dangerous Landscape

    Ok, now that I’ve laid out some of the pieces, lets take a closer look at the weather. I already mentioned that the weather plays a role in how REPs forecast their monthly energy purchases. I’ve also mentioned that this is the hottest summer Texas has seen in decades. So now lets take a look at exactly what that means when those two things combine. Unless an REP specifically forecast an August that had no rain and more than two straight weeks of 110 degree temperatures in Dallas and 103 degree temperatures in Houston, then odds are they underestimated how much electricity they had to buy for August. I’m speculating here, but I feel extremely confident when I say that almost no REP in the market predicted this kind of heat, consecutively, this long without rain. Which means that almost no REP bought enough electricity in advance to meet this kind of demand. I’m betting that almost everyone is short.

    So what happens when everyone is short? Well, the short answer is that REPs have to spot buy energy to cover the needs and demand of their customers. And when REPs have to buy short, they have to pay a premium. But what happens when the grid is operating at maximum capacity…for consecutive days and even weeks? How does an REP buy electricity when there’s almost no electricity to purchase? The answer to that question is that the cost of buying this electricity goes way up. At the height of a day’s heat, back in July, the highest consistent prices we saw were 300 per unit. And mostly it was anywhere between 30 and 100. The same numbers here, for about 3 hours a day each day for the past two weeks have been 3000. So the cost of buying spot power is 100 times more expensive if a company has shorted their demand. And above I’ve made the assumption that almost everyone has to have shorted their demand. So instead of an electricity company maybe having to cut some checks for 5k if they need to spot buy some power, now being short will cost them 500k. And that’s just an estimate for smaller or medium sized companies. What happens for guys like Reliant or TXU with millions of customers? They could be having to cut checks to ERCOT for energy in the 5-10 million rage. And that is PER DAY. And we’ve been having record heat and a maxed out grid for the past 10 business days, and there’s no relief in site for the hot weather.

    More on the Financials

    So if you’re a bigger electricity provider with near a million customers or more, such as Reliant, TXU, or Direct Energy, could you end up having to write a check to ERCOT for 50 million or more in excess energy purchases because of this heat? Quite possibly, but lets not pretend that the big guys have a slush fund where they can write a check for that kind of money without feeling any pain, because they cannot. That will hurt a LOT, but they’ll probably survive. They also have energy generation resources that likely give them quite a few advantages in terms of trading and energy purchases because of the amount they buy, as well as connections they likely have with their own traders from back when Texas was regulated. But what about companies like Stream and Ambit, who have hundreds of thousands of customers between them, and no access to any trading benefits in Texas? Or larger companies like First Choice Power or Cirro? Can these companies afford to write a check for 15-20 million dollars for the month of August just to cover power? Even big companies rarely operate with that much cash on hand, particularly in an industry where margins are so small. And what about smaller companies, with less than 20k customers? Do we really think those companies have the kind of cash reserves that they can afford to burn hundreds of thousands of dollars a day in spot energy purchases to meet their customer’s demands?

    And there’s one more financial consideration to consider: Ancillary Charges. Now, I’m not going to lie, I don’t completely understand Ancillary Charges and everything that goes into them. I do know that they’re basically fees paid to ERCOT by the REPs as a percentage of an REPs total “load” on the marketplace. Basically, it’s a check that has to be cut to ERCOT based on how many customers an REP has on the market, or their percentage of the electricity on the grid. In other words, the bigger a company, the bigger the bill for Ancillary charges. Talking to some of the people in the market place, because of the increased amount of energy on the grid, smaller and medium sized companies might be paying an additional 50-100k dollars a DAY in Ancillary Charges, and this is entirely on top of their spot energy purchases. And all of this is on top of whatever operational costs they have as a company, like employee salaries and insurance, etc. I can assure everyone, this is a complete nightmare for the Texas electricity market.

    Final Thoughts

    One thing I think is important to consider here is that this really is a fluke circumstance. It’s not like any of these businesses have likely done anything wrong, it is simply that this weather is so far outside the realm of any expectation that no one could reasonably expect temperatures this high, this many days in a row. And there’s no relief in sight from the weather, with temperatures projected in the high 100′s in Dallas all week, and the low 100′s in Houston. Electricity Companies are absolutely bleeding cash and writing huge checks unless they forecast weeks of 100 degree weather and zero precipitation across the entire state and purchased their energy accordingly back in July. And even if they did, they’re still cutting ERCOT huge checks every day because of the massive amount of electricity being used by a grid that is running at 100% maximum capacity for the past week and, again, likely to be running near 100% capacity all through August.

    Let me try and sum this up as easily as possible. Back in February, we had a couple of cold snaps that maxed out the electricity grid for a couple days, caused electricity outages, and generally really stuck it to the electricity providers. As a result, two companies went out of business because they couldn’t come up with the money to pay ERCOT for their energy purchases and Ancillary Charges. Compared with this record drought weather, that cold snap is starting to look like a walk in the park for REPs. I would not be surprised to see anywhere from 10 or even 20 electricity providers having to fold up shop or getting purchased by the larger entities for a song. It will be interesting to see, but I bet by September the landscape of deregulated Texas electricity doesn’t look anything at all the way it does today. The only question is how many guys will go out of business, and how the market will permanently change as a result if a mass exodus of competitive electricity providers takes place.

    If a massive change does take place, I’ll examine what it means for consumers in the marketplace in regards to electric choice. But right now, it’s simply important that customers understand what is happening behind the scenes at their electricity providers.

    Texas Electricity: Minimum Usage Charges

    Earlier this week, I got an email from a Texas Electricity Ratings reader, suggesting I write an article about Minimum Usage charges. We’ve discussed Minimum Usage charges in the past here, but to clear things up, in short, they’re additional charges that are tacked onto a person’s bill if they use less than a certain amount of electricity per month.

    The tricky part is that the charges and the thresholds for the charges are different for every REP (Retail Electricity Provider). Which is what the reader asked me about. I thought it was a great idea, and I should have thought of it myself a long time ago. So I ran through most of the major providers operating in Texas and researched to put together a list of the minimal usage charges for each provider, as best as I could find. So below is a guide to the minimal usage charges for Texas electricity.

    Ambit Energy: $9.99 for less than 1000 kWh per month
    Amigo Energy: Depending on the plan it is $9.95 of $6.95 for less than 1000 kWh per month
    Bounce Energy: $4.95 for less than 1000 kWh per month for almost all of their plans, except intro plans are $6.96 per month for less than 1000 kWh.
    Champion Energy: $4.95 for less than 500 kWh per month
    Cirro Energy: $5.25 for less than 1000 kWh per month
    Direct Energy: I couldn’t find a Monthly Fee in their Terms of Service or EFLs
    Dynowatt: $6.95 for less than 1000 kWh per month
    First Choice Power: $5 for less than 650 kWh per month, plus a $4.95 base charge
    GEXA Energy: Seems to simply use a sliding rate per plan for different usage w/o a minimum charge
    Green Mountain Energy: Didn’t seem to see any minimum usage charge in the EFL or Terms of Service
    Mega Energy: $12.96 for less than 1000 kWh per month
    MX Energy: Seems to simply use a sliding rate per plan for different usage w/o minimum charge
    Reliant Energy: $9.95 for less than 800 kWh per month
    Southwest Power & Light: I didn’t see minimum usage but they had a $7.95 monthly meter fee.
    Spark Energy: $8.99 for less than 1000 kWh per month
    StarTex Power: $4.99 for less than 500 kWh per month
    Tara Energy: $6.95 for less than 500 kWh per month
    Texas Power: $10.00 for less than 1000 kWh per month
    TXU Energy: TXU uses a base $4.95 charge and sliding rates for less or greater than 1000 kWh, per plan.

    Also, I’d like to point out a few other things about the list above. First off, just because I didn’t find a charge doesn’t mean there isn’t one…I just could have missed it looking through the documents. Additionally, all the EFLs I looked at were from plans in the Centerpoint service area. I looked at at least 2-3 plans for each provider to get an idea of consistent charges listed…I did NOT pour through every EFL from every single provider. This is simply to give people and idea of what to expect, and hopefully be helpful. Also, it’s important to note that for the guys that don’t have any minimal usage charge, chances are high they simply tacked it onto their sliding rate scale. But if you find a great price on a guy with no listed charges, then absolutely go for it.

    One last note, Stream Energy’s EFL was…weird. Despite advertising their tiered pricing for rates on a 500, 1000, and 2000 kWh scale like everyone else in the market, the fine print of the EFL says their actual tiers are:

    The Price is a tiered
    pricing structure, based on the following tiers: i) up to 699 kWh depicted in the EFL as Average Monthly Usage of 500 kWh, ii) 700 to 1,499 kWh depicted in the EFL as Average Monthly Usage of 1,000 kWh, and iii) 1,500 to 2,499 kWh depicted in the EFL as Average Monthly Usage of 2,000 kW

    So just keep in mind that you have to use a bit more electricity to get to their cheaper electricity rates.

    Any questions?

    Market Rates: Houston Electricity 4/26

    Good morning, everyone. Today’s entry into our shopping guide for Texas electricity covers the prices for Centerpoint, which includes Houston electricity. The electricity rates in Houston are lower than most other areas of Texas, but even as a low priced area, the increasing summer temperatures will end up raising the rates sooner rather than later. The most commonly ordered electricity plans are listed below and include: long term fixed rate electricity plans, month to month electricity plans, and environmentally friendly green energy plans. The list below is a good place to start the shopping process and save money.

    Month to Month Electricity Plans:

  • Reliant Energy – 5.4
  • StarTex Power – 5.4
  • Mega Energy – 5.6
  • Kinetic Energy – 5.7
  • Frontier Utilities – 6.4
  • Bounce Energy – 7.0
  • Month to Month Green Electricity Plans:

  • Kinetic Energy – 7.2
  • Reliant Energy – 7.3
  • Bounce Energy – 7.3
  • Southwest Power & Light – 7.6
  • YEP – 8.2
  • Dynowatt – 8.4
  • Long Term Fixed Rate Electricity Plans:

  • Reliant Energy – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.1
  • Southwest Power & Light – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.3
  • Brilliant Energy – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.4
  • YEP – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.4
  • Brilliant Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.2
  • Mega Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.2
  • Gexa Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.3
  • Reliant Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.3
  • Brilliant Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.8
  • Mega Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.9
  • Kinetic Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 10.0
  • Amigo Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 10.0
  • Long Term Fixed Rate Green Electricity Plans:

  • Southwest Power & Light – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.6
  • Reliant Energy – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.6
  • Mega Energy – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.7
  • Tara Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.6
  • Mega Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.7
  • Southwest Power & Light – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.8
  • Gexa Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.8
  • Kinetic Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.8
  • Kinetic Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 10.2
  • Tara Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 10.3
  • Mega Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 10.4
  • Market Rates: West Texas 12/10

    The shopping guide region for Texas electricity rates that we’re examining today is West Texas (Texas New Mexico Power region). The electric prices in this area typically mirror the electricity rates found in the Houston region. In fact, this week it looks like some of them might even be slightly lower than Houston rates, although to be honest we’re splitting hairs here. The month to month electric rates start at 7, with the longer fixed electricity rates starting in the mid 7′s and 8′s in terms of kWh. Green energy plans also start in the mid 7′s.

    Month to Month Electricity Plans:

  • Dynowatt – 7.0
  • Reliant Energy – 7.0
  • Southwest Power & Light – 7.1
  • YEP – 7.2
  • APNA Energy – 7.3
  • StarTex Power – 7.4
  • Bounce Energy – 7.5
  • Month to Month Green Electricity Plans:

  • Dynowatt – 7.5
  • Southwest Power & Light – 7.7
  • YEP – 7.8
  • Simple Power – 8.2
  • Bounce Energy – 8.5
  • Amigo Energy – 8.9
  • Long Term Fixed Electricity Plans:

  • Bounce Energy – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 7.7
  • Southwest Power & Light – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 7.8
  • Amigo Energy – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 7.8
  • Amigo Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 8.4
  • Southwest Power & Light – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 8.5
  • Spark Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 8.5
  • Tara Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.0
  • APNA Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.0
  • Amigo Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.1
  • Texas Power – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.1
  • Long Term Fixed Rate Green Electricity Plans:

  • Gexa Energy – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 8.4
  • Southwest Power & Light – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 8.8
  • Bounce Energy – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 8.8
  • Tara Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 8.6
  • Southwest Power & Light – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 8.8
  • YEP – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 8.9
  • Tara Energy – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.0
  • Southwest Power & Light – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.8
  • YEP – 24 Month Fixed Plan – 9.9
  • Market Rate: Green Energy Plans 9/10

    Here is this weeks shopping guide, in time for the weekend, for the shoppers looking for green energy. The plans on the list below are the cheapest plans for 100% environmentally friendly plans that can help shoppers save money and be earth friendly. All of the 5 TDSP regions of Texas are represented, so everyone can get the cheapest green Texas electricity in their area.

    Oncor:

  • Dynowatt – Month to Month Plan – 8.5
  • Simple Power – Month to Month Plan – 8.6
  • Gexa – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.0
  • Simple Power – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.2
  • Spark Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.2
  • Kinetic Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.2
  • StarTex Power – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.3
  • Centerpoint:

  • Dynowatt – Month to Month Plan – 9.0
  • Simple Power – Month to Month Plan – 9.4
  • Bounce Energy – Month to Month Plan – 9.5
  • Southwest Power & Light – Month to Month Plan – 9.5
  • Gexa – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.7
  • Simple Power – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 10.2
  • Spark Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 10.2
  • Kinetic Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 10.2
  • Tara Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 10.2
  • AEP Central:

  • Dynowatt – Month to Month Plan – 9.4
  • Simple Power – Month to Month Plan – 9.7
  • Gexa – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 10.1
  • Simple Power – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 10.4
  • Spark Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 10.4
  • Tara Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 10.4
  • Kinetic Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 10.4
  • AEP North:

  • Dynowatt – Month to Month Plan – 8.8
  • Simple Power – Month to Month Plan – 9.3
  • Simple Power – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.3
  • Dynowatt – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.5
  • Simple Power – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.6
  • Tara Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.8
  • TNMP:

  • Dynowatt – Month to Month Plan – 8.4
  • Simple Power – Month to Month Plan – 8.6
  • Gexa – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.1
  • Simple Power – 6 Month Fixed Plan – 9.3
  • Spark Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.0
  • Tara Energy – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.0
  • StarTex Power – 12 Month Fixed Plan – 9.1
  • Market Prices: Month to Month Plans 5/3

    It’s a busy day here at Texas Electricity Ratings. I’m in the process of updating our rankings based on the performance and activity of the last 3 months of the different electricity providers. However, before I get to publishing that information, I wanted to be sure to get our the monday Shopping Guide for different Month to Month plans in the electricity marketplace. So here’s our look at the different electric rates for month to month plans available to customers. As always, check to make sure if the rates are promotional rates, and if so, what the rates will be a month or two after a customers signs up for service. Particularly, a couple of the plans listed below are definitely promotional rates, so be sure to ask questions or read the fine print when ordering.

    Cheapest Month to Month Plans:

  • StarTex Power – 7.9
  • APNA Energy – 7.9
  • Dynowatt – 7.9
  • Southwest Power & Light – 8.0
  • YEP – 8.0
  • Bounce Energy – 8.3
  • And now, as always, here’s a look at the most expensive plans in the market for comparison.

    Most Expensive Month to Month Plans

  • Texpo – 12.7
  • Reliant – 12.4
  • Just Energy – 11.6
  • Market Prices – Month to Month Plans -3/29

    Ok, it’s Monday, so we’re taking a look at the lowest prices in the Texas Electricity market for Month to Month plans. This includes Variable rates and Indexed rates. Remember, if you’re shopping for a Month to Month plan, make sure you check to see if the rate listed here is a promotional rate. Read your fine print to make sure you’re not going to get hit with a much higher rate just as the summer months start. Checking the electricity facts label might be the best way to save money.

    Lowest Month to Month Rates:

  • Dynowatt – 7.8
  • Startex Power – 8.3
  • Bounce Energy – 8.5
  • Simple Power – 8.5
  • MX Energy – 8.5
  • Highest Month to Month Rates

  • First Choice Power – 14.6
  • Reliant Energy – 13.4
  • Texpo Energy – 12.7
  • After that, there were lots of different providers with plans in the same range. But once again, the big winner was First Choice Power, which was far and away the most expensive provider this week when it comes to Texas electricity and month to month plans.